Here the defeat of Sicera is described in two different genres, the first a historical narrative . . .
(Judges 4:14b-16 HNV)14b “So Barak went down from Mount Tabor, and ten thousand men after him. 15 The LORD confused Sisera, and all his chariots, and all his army, with the edge of the sword before Barak; and Sisera alighted from his chariot, and fled away on his feet. 16 But Barak pursued after the chariots, and after the army, to Harosheth of the Gentiles: and all the army of Sisera fell by the edge of the sword; there was not a man left.”
Now the equivalent from a poetic song . . .
(Judges 5:20-21 HNV)20 “From the sky the stars fought.
From their courses, they fought against Sisera.
21 The river Kishon swept them away,
that ancient river, the river Kishon.
My soul, march on with strength.”
The genre of a text describes the kind of literary work it represents and can tell us something about the situation in which it was intended to be used (its sitz im leben or setting in life). For example:
A text’s genre can tell us a lot about how we should interpret that text. For example, a poem about an event would be interpreted quite differently to a historical account of that event.
Whilst genre is usually discussed with reference to written material it can apply to any type of creative endeavour, thus the concept also applies to art, music and even oration.
If you view the Sermon as a coherent discourse then it should have a single setting and an overall genre. Yest, even if you side with those who see the Sermon as a collection of sayings, then it remains valid to ask the question, for the gospel’s editor may well have imposed a specific genre upon their redacted speech in order to progress their story.
As a whole, it is clear that the Sermon is a speech delivered to a group of supporters. However, is it possible to be more specific as to the type of oration this was? In taking a scriptural passage and expounding upon it, it lives up to the title that Augustine bestowed upon it, for it does indeed resemble a sermon, or more specifically rabbinical preaching (whose distinctive signature is found in the Golden Rule). However, behind its sermonesque façade, Jesus’ words have shades of another distinctive genre, the campaign rally speech. Like such an address they include:
A rallying speech is just the sort of genre that one might expect to find Jesus resorting to at the outset of his Galilean ministry. Nor would he be the last preacher to interpret scripture in a manner that exhibited such political overtones.
The political aspect of the Sermon is apparent in the language some scholars use to describe its elements. For example, Vermes (2004, 311-2) sees the Beatitudes a “manifesto for the seekers of the kingdom” and in a sense he is quite right to do so, for embodied within them is God’s promise of the difference that returning to the way of righteousness makes. Thus the Beatitudes were every bit as political as Mandela envisaging a South Africa without apartheid or Ghandi envisaging an India free from British domination.
If one believes a later editor has composed the Sermon from a range of sayings, each dragged from their original context, it becomes particularly pertinent to assess the genre of each in turn. However, even if the Sermon was delivered as a single entity, the extensive re-use of its sayings within parallel passages suggests that many of them effectively stand alone and therefore also have a genre in their own right.
Geza Vermes, as part of his form-critical assessment of the
authenticity of Jesus’ sayings, has undertaken an
assessment of the genre of each saying found within the Synoptic Gospels.
The following is a summary of his
conclusions,
as far as they concern the Sermon (Vermes
2004,
419-436):
Vermes, Geza. 2004. The Authentic Gospel of Jesus. London: Penguin.